"newer" News
31.03.02 :
URGE THE WORLD BANK TO IMPLEMENT THE WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS RECOMMENDATIONS
( Mar 15, 2002 - Apr 15, 2002) Let the World Bank know that you, as
a taxpayer, do not want your public funds to support dam projects
that are not environmentally sustainable or that compromise international
human rights standards. Call on the World Bank to implement the recommendations
of the World Commission on Dams to prevent the use of your funds for
the financing of environmentally and socially destructive dam projects.
Read on for more information and then go to http://www.actglobal.org/campaigns/wcd_wolfensohn/
to sign the letter.
A Joint Call to Action From Environmental Defense
and International Rivers Network
Large hydropower projects often do more than generate
power or provide irrigation water. In fact, over the past century,
the construction and operation of large dams has forced 40-80 million
people from their homes and lands, depleted fisheries, destroyed aquatic
life and habitat, and benefited mainly better-off segments of the
population while leaving the poor to bear the economic, social, and
environmental costs. These were the findings of the World Commission
on Dams (WCD), an independent, multi-stakeholder review that was launched
by the World Bank and the World Conservation Union (IUCN) in 1997.
The WCD examined the results of the world's 45,000
large dams in an unprecedented series of public hearings with affected
peoples, government and industry representatives and members of the
scientific community, and a massive research effort that culminated
in the report, Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making.
The report proposes "a new framework for decision-making
that moves beyond simple cost-benefit trade-offs to introduce an inclusive
'rights and risks approach' which recognizes all legitimate stakeholders
in negotiating development choices." Most importantly, the report
identifies specific procedures and clear criteria for equitable, efficient,
participatory and sustainable water resource development, which, if
followed, could solve many of the ongoing problems associated with
existing dams, avoid past mistakes in future dams, and promote a broader
array of water and energy choices.
The recommendations of the final report have been
endorsed by non-governmental organizations, the United Nations Environment
Program (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Export-Import
Bank, as well as by private sector companies such as the Swedish construction
firm, Skanska. However, the World Bank, one of the two original sponsors
of the WCD, has refused to incorporate the recommendations into its
policies, committing only to use them as a "reference point" on a
case-by-case basis for its financing of dam projects. Please email
Mr. James Wolfensohn, President of the World Bank, to urge him to
implement the WCD's recommendations as binding World Bank policy.
Go to http://www.actglobal.org/campaigns/wcd_wolfensohn/
to sign the letter and take action.
28.03. 02
e: Today on the german - french TV Channel "ARTE":
Waterwar in Spain
, 8.15 pm GMT+1
by : Thomas Chatel et Gernot Steinweg (Allemagne, 2002-26mn)
Coproduction : ARTE G.E.I.E. / Picture Pan ARTE G.E.I.E.
A film on the highly controversial Spanish National Hydroelectric
Plan (NHP) plans the building of 120 new dams as well as huge transfers
from the Ebro river to the south-east of Spain and from the Rhône
river to Barcelona. Since it is contrary to sustainable development
objectives, all environmental and other NGOs, as well as numerous
academics, scientists, unions and political parties are trying to
stop this project..... for more information on the National Hydro
Plan see ERNs Webpage: http://www.rivernet.org/Iberian/planhydroeng.htm
28.03.02 f
: Ce soir le 28 mars, 20.15 sur ARTE: ESPAGNE : LA GUERRE DE L'EAU
L'Espagne projette de détourner les flots de l'èbre au
bénéfice des régions du sud du pays. Réalisation : Thomas Chatel et
Gernot Steinweg, 26min) Coproduction : ARTE G.E.I.E. / Picture Pan
ARTE G.E.I.E.
Enquête sur une "bataille de l'eau" au sein d'un pays membre de l'Union
européenne. Selon les experts, la question de l'eau a toutes les chances
d'être au cœur de conflits majeurs au cours des prochaines décennies.
En Espagne, la bataille de l'eau a déjà commencé. Depuis des millénaires,
l'èbre fait la richesse des régions du Nord, notamment de l'Aragon
et de la Catalogne. Un vaste projet des autorités espagnoles prévoit
de "détourner" le fleuve au profit des provinces du sud du pays. Le
projet suppose d'édifier plus de 120 retenues d'eau le long des Pyrénées
et de dériver les flots sur plus d'un millier de kilomètres vers le
sud de l'Espagne. Il se heurte à l'opposition des provinces du Nord
: pour elles, le projet signifie la destruction de plusieurs villages,
et surtout risque de mettre en danger l'économie locale, l'agriculture
et l'élevage. Pour le moment, les travaux sont suspendus à la décision
de l'Union européenne de les financer ou pas. Or, l'Espagne préside,
depuis le 1er janvier, le Conseil de l'UE... plus d'infos sur le Plan
hydro nationa de l'Espagne: http://www.rivernet.org/Iberian/planhydroeng.htm
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
28.03.02
d : Heute abend 28. März, 20.15 auf ARTE: Wasserkrieg in Spanien
Spanien, Reportage von Thomas Chatel und Gernot Steinweg , 26 min
Coproduction : ARTE G.E.I.E. / Picture Pan ARTE G.E.I.E. Mit der Großdemonstration
in Barcelona am 10.März hat der spanische "Wasserkrieg" seinen vorläufigen
Höhepunkt erreicht. Während der spanischen EU-Ratspräsidentschaft
gingen Tausende Anhänger der "Bürgerinitiative zum Schutz des Ebro"
auf die Straße. Von der EU verlangte die aufgebrachte Menge, den Wasserverteilungsplan
der spanischen Regierung nicht länger finanziell zu fördern. Mit Subventionen
aus den Kassen der Brüsseler Kommission sollen in Spanien 120 neue
Stauseen und eine tausend Kilometer lange Ableitung des Ebrowassers
an die Gestade des Mittelmeers gebaut werden. Dieser Plan stützt sich
auf die Lobby der Tourismusbranche und der auf den Export orientierten
Landwirtschaft in den Wasserempfängergebieten. Das Staudammprojekt
in den Pyrenäen bedroht fruchtbare Talböden, die Bauern und Viehzüchter
sehen ihre Dörfer und ihr Kulturerbe in akuter Gefahr. Der Bürgermeister
des vom Yessa-Staudamm bedrohten Dorfes Artieda sagt: " Gerade wurde
mit EU-Geldern unsere Region entwickelt, jetzt soll sie mit EU-Mitteln
zerstört werden." Die Befürworter des Wasserverteilungsplans erwarten,
dass der Ackerbau auf neue, bisher ungeeignete Gebiete ausgeweitet
werden kann, mögliche Umweltschäden wie die Versalzung von gesundem
Steppenland nehmen sie in Kauf. Aber im spanischen Norden will keine
der Protestgruppen akzeptieren, dass ihre Heimat für die Wasserverschwendung
des Südens geopfert wird. mehr Infos zum spanischen Nationalen Hydro
Projekt (engl. franz. ): http://www.rivernet.org/Iberian/planhydroeng.htm
22.03.02 : World Water Day,
Message of Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General, on the occasion of World
Day for Water 2002
World's Water problems can be "catalyst for cooperation"
UN Headquarters, New York, 26 February,
"The theme of this year's observance of World Day
for Water - 'Water for Development' - reflects the fundamental place
of water in sustaining life and conserving the environment. "An estimated
1.1 billion people lack access to safe drinking water, 2.5 billion
people have no access to proper sanitation, and more than 5 million
people die each year from water-related diseases -- 10 times the number
killed in wars, on average, each year. All too often, water is treated
as an infinite free good. Yet even where supplies are sufficient or
plentiful, they are increasingly at risk from pollution and rising
demand.
By 2025, two thirds of the world's population is likely to live in
countries with moderate or severe water shortages. Fierce national
competition over water resources has prompted fears that water issues
contain the seeds of violent conflict. "But the water problems facing
our world need not be only a cause of tension; they can also be a
catalyst for cooperation. Two thirds of the world's major rivers are
shared by several States.
More than 300 rivers cross national boundaries. Increasingly, countries
with expertise in the management of watersheds and flood-plains, or
with experience in efficient irrigation, are sharing that knowledge
and technology with others. Scientists from many nations and disciplines
are pooling their efforts, to assess the threat and in the hopes of
bringing about a much-needed "blue revolution" in agricultural productivity.
The organizations of the United Nations system, for their part, in
addition to a vast array of operational projects are also preparing
the first edition of the World Water Development Report. "Later this
year, heads of State and government, non-overnmental organizations,
private sector representatives and many others will gather in Johannesburg
for the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
The United Nations General Assembly has proclaimed next year the 'International
Year of Freshwater'. Everyone has a stake in seizing these opportunities
to chart a decisive course of action for meeting the Millennium Development
Goals on access to freshwater. If we work together, a secure and sustainable
water future can be ours."
Links:
- World Water Day Website
- actions
14.03.02 : On March 14th, river activists from around the
world unite for the International Day of Action Against Dams and for
Rivers, Water and Life.
The day was announced by the participants of the First
International Meeting of People Affected by Dams held in Curitiba,
Brazil in 1997. March 14th is the Brazilian Day of Struggles Against
Dams. More than 47 actions in 23 countries are taking place on this
International Day of Action!
- Background
Informations are available on ERNs Website
for living Rivers
- ERNs Pressrelease, format pdf,
in french, soon in english
- See some of the exciting 2002 Day of Action Events: http://www.irn.org/dayofaction/
14.03.02 : 14 MARS, JOURNEE
INTERNATIONALE D'ACTION CONTRE LES BARRAGES ET POUR LES RIVIERES,
L'EAU ET LA VIE : l'époque des grands barrages est révolue !
Pour la 5ème fois, cette journée mondiale d'action contre les barrages
et pour les rivières, l'eau et la vie est célébrée sur tous les continents.
La journée a trois objectifs principaux : célébrer l'importance des
rivières dans le cycle de vie ; sensibiliser l'opinion sur la nécessité
de leur protection et protester contre leur destruction.
Cette Journée Internationale d'Action a été lancée en 1997 lors de
la Conférence internationale des Personnes affectées par les Barrages
qui s'est tenue à Curitiba au Brésil 1 . Les cofondateurs sont International
Rivers Network (IRN), European Rivers Network (ERN), Mouvement brésilien
contre les barrages (MAB), India's Save the Narmada Movement (NBA),
Chile's Biobío Action Group (GABB).
Chaque année à l'occasion de cette journée, de nombreuses actions
ont lieu sur tous les continents.
-
Background Informations en anglais sur ERNs
Website pour des rivières vivnatess
- Com. de presse de ERN-SOS LOIRE VIVANTE
et du WWF FRnace, format pdf, en français
- Actions 2002 : http://www.irn.org/dayofaction/
10.03.02 : Barcelona: 400-500'000
against the spanish National Hydrological Plan
Sunday 10th of March 2002, called by NGOs, members
of " La Plataforma en defensa de l'Elbre"; academics ; political parties
and unions demonstrated in Barcelona against the NHP (Watertransfer,
118 dams). Between 400.000 and 500.000 participants and Delegations
from different areas of Spain were in Barcelona to voice their disagreement.
This demonstration was planned right before the 14th of March : worldwide
day against dams and the 15 th & 16th March : the European Summit
of the 15 EU environmental ministers in Barcelona.
A delegation of ERN (European Rivers Network)
visited with green Euro-Deputys and the Leaders of the "Plataforma"
(Organizers) the Ebro Delta, participated at the demonstration and
was very warmly welcomed. More information, News, Documents, Links,
Photos and more on the Spanish National Hydrological Plan. are available
on our Website for living Rivers !
More information, News, Documents, Links, Photos and
more on the
Spanish National
Hydrological Plan. are available on our Website for living Rivers
!
09.03.02 : 'BURIED DAMS' HELP CLEAN RECYCLED
WATER (?? Red.)
Disease-causing microbes can effectively be eliminated
from recycled water by storing it underground, new research by CSIRO
scientists has found. Promising research findings into natural ways
to cleanse polluted water have brought Australia a step closer to
a revolution in water reclamation the “underground dam”. Researchers
at CSIRO Land and Water have for several years been investigating
the feasibility of diverting urban stormwater and treated effluent
into underground aquifers, where it can be recycled for use on parks,
gardens, ovals and farms. The idea is to harvest surplus water during
the wet part of the year, store it underground for some months, then
bring it to the surface again for irrigation during the dry season.
Researchers consider these underground dams offer a uniquely Australian
solution to the problems of water storage, water conservation and
recycling. The water will be injected into appropriate aquifers, where
it is protected from evaporation or pollution and does not submerge
valuable land or habitat, as does a surface dam. Now, microbiologist
Dr Simon Toze has produced the clear evidence that storing water underground
also purges it of disease-causing organisms, making it clean enough
to recycle as irrigation. “We’ve been studying the behaviour and fate
of various microbes in groundwater taken from different parts of the
country,” he explains. “We’ve looked at enteric (gut) viruses, the
protozoan Cryptosporidium, and disease-causing bacteria like Salmonella
and Aeromonas. “If we are to store large volumes of water underground
for recycling, we need to know exactly what happens with these bugs,
and whether they can survive in reclaimed water.” Once underground,
the disease-causing organisms face a hostile array conditions such
as temperature changes, lack of oxygen, lack of nutrients and a whole
army of naturally occurring groundwater microorganisms that kill or
inactivate them. In experiments undertaken in aquifers and under controlled
conditions in the laboratory simulating conditions of an underground
aquifer, results have shown that the disease-causing microbes can
last less than one month, he has found. “This makes underground storage
one of the most promising ways to cleanse and recycle water. “Australia
is naturally a dry continent, and in many areas our groundwater resources
are being heavily exploited. This appears to offer a safe, clean way
to recharge them. “We also need to think about our environment, and
the importance to natural streams and wetlands of maintaining adequate
subsurface water supplies.” Dr Toze has tested the antiviral activity
of indigenous microbes in groundwater taken from South Australia,
the Northern Territory, Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia.
In every case the large numbers of virus added to the water disappeared
in less than six weeks. “Since water injected into an aquifer is likely
to remain underground for several months before being re-used for
irrigation, it looks as if there will be a comfortable safety margin.”
Dr Toze says that, for many of Australia’s more arid towns and cities,
reclaiming water will soon be an essential practice. “At present people
still describe this as “waste water” but that is a bad term, and
it shows how limited our thinking still is towards water. Instead,
Australians need to focus on the productive uses of reclaimed water.
“This sort of water is not intended for drinking, but for the irrigation
of parks, gardens, farms, ovals and street verges. “I believe that
in pioneering this sort of water re-use, Australia is showing the
world a lead in a field that will be increasingly vital to the human
and environmental future,” Dr Toze says.
source: European Water Management News
08.03.02 : Spanish water transfer plan "finalised"
Environment Daily 1174, 08/03/02
The planned course of the water transfer canal at the heart of the
Spain's controversial national hydrological plan has been changed
"to minimise its environmental impact", environment minister Jaume
Matas announced yesterday. The canal from northern to south-eastern
Spain is to be shortened to 912 km. And by building more tunnels and
making use of existing infrastructure the new route will reduce the
number of incursions into Natura 2000 nominated sites from 18 in the
initial plan to four, according to the minister (ED 06/09/00 http://www.environmentdaily.com/articles/index.cfm?action=article&ref=8264).
Mr Matas expressed confidence that what he described as the definitive
route will help to overcome environmental objections to the transfer
plan. These have been debated in the European parliament and have
prompted some MEPs to call for EU funds to be withheld. The government
hopes the EU will contribute 30% of the estimated euros 4.2bn budget,
unchanged from the original plan. Opposition socialist party (PSOE)
environment spokeswoman Cristina Narbona told Environment Daily she
believed the government was "deliberately underestimating the total
cost of the scheme, which under the water framework directive will
have to be passed on to the consumer". She added that the minister
was wrong to describe the route as definitive "before environmental
impact assessments have been carried out". She also criticised the
water transfer project as "unsustainable in principle", claiming that
"it is already fuelling a speculative building boom on remaining virgin
areas of the south-eastern coastline".
Follow-up: Spanish environment ministry
http://www.mma.es/, tel: +34 91 597
6000;
PSOE
http://www.psoe.es/NuevasPoliticas-NuevosTiempos/home.htm, tel:
+34 91 582 0444.
more information, News, Documents,
Links, Photos and more on the
Spanish National Hydrological Plan.
are available on our Website for living Rivers !
07.03.02 : JAILED ANTI-DAM AUTHOR RELEASED
AFTER ONE DAY
By Frederick Noronha NEW DELHI, India, March 7, 2002
(ENS) - Indian author Arundhati Roy was sent to a New Delhi jail by
the Indian Supreme Court Wednesday to serve a sentence of one day,
after being found guilty of criminal contempt of court in a prominent
environmental case.
For full text and graphics visit:
http://ens-news.com/ens/mar2002/2002L-03-07-01.html
27.0202 : Swiss bank quits
Turkish dam project (BBC News)
Wednesday, 27 February,
2002, 16:20 GMT
Swiss bank quits Turkish dam project Switzerland's largest bank, UBS,
has pulled out of a troubled dam project in Turkey, saying it was
concerned about its social and environmental impact. Environmental
groups have strongly criticised the Ilisu dam project in the south-east
of the country - saying the scheme would displace tens of thousands
of people and flood historic towns. Its future had already been thrown
into doubt after the main contractors in the $1.5bn project - British
consortium firm Balfour Beatty and Impregilo of Italy - withdrew in
November for similar reasons. Now, UBS has ended its financial backing
for the controversial project. "The decisive factor behind this termination
is that the general progress of the project has been unsatisfactory
in recent years," UBS said in a statement. "Until now there has been
no definitive decision on what accompanying measures are to be taken
to minimise the social and environmental impact of the project," it
said. Controversy The Ilisu dam is part of an enormous regeneration
scheme known as the Gap project. Turkey plans it to be the second
largest of 22 dams for generating electricity and irrigation in an
area hit by poverty. But ever since the dam was proposed, critics
have argued that it would flood 300,000 sq km of land, including the
sites of ancient Ottoman and Byzantine towns and villages. They also
say that more than 30,000 local people, mostly ethnic Kurds, would
be displaced. Neighbouring Syria and lraq have also objected to what
they say is a potential reduction of the water flow in the River Tigris.
The news seems to have come as a surprise to Turkey's Energy Ministry.
The ministry told the BBC it was preparing a statement, but said the
contractors building the dam were responsible for it and they would
have to deal with the withdrawal of UBS.
-
BBC News
- Webpage UBS
- More RiverNet News on Ilisu
27.02.02
Schweizer Grossbank zieht sich aus dem Ilisu Grosstaudammprojekt zurück
Was lange währt wird endlich gut:
Die Erklärung von Bern begrüsst den Rücktritt der UBS aus dem Beratungsmandat
für den Bau des türkischen Ilisu-Wasserkraftprojekts
Zürich, 27. Februar 2002 Mediencommuniqué "Erklärung
vonBern"
Die UBS teilte am 27. Februar 2002 mit, dass
sie den seit 1997 bestehenden Mandatsvertrag mit der Lieferfirma zur
Beratung, Strukturierung und Arrangierung der Finanzierung auflösen
wird. Sie gab zu, dass bis heute keine abschliessende Festlegung der
flankierenden Massnahmen zur Eindämmung der sozialen und ökologischen
Auswirkungen des Projekts erfolgt ist. Die Schweizer Grossbank entspricht
damit den Forderungen der Erklärung von Bern, die bereits seit mehreren
Jahren die schweren ökologischen Folgen des geplanten Staudamms Kraftwerks
kritisiert und Menschenrechtsverletzungen anprangert. Der Ausstieg
der UBS kommt allerdings reichlich spät. Spätestens seit Erscheinen
der offiziellen Umwelt- und Sozialverträglichkeitsprüfung (UVP), im
Juni 2001, war offensichtlich, dass das Mammutkraftwerk nicht den
gängigen Standards entspricht. Der Ausstieg der UBS stellt allein
noch kein Scheitern des Projekts dar, bedeutet allerdings eine wesentliche
Verzögerung des Baubeginns. Die verbleibenden Firmen müssen nun eine
neue Bank suchen, welche die finanzielle Abwicklung des Projekts koordiniert.
Dies dürfte auch angesichts der schweren Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise
der Türkei schwierig werden, die für Banken ein hohes Länderrisiko
darstellt. Bei der schweizerischen Exportrisikogarantie hat das Projekt
deshalb vorerst keine Priorität. Die Erklärung von Bern sieht sich
mit dem Rücktritt der UBS in ihrer scharfen Kritik am Ilisu Kraftwerk-Projekt
bestätigt.
Infos zur Pressemitteilung der Erklärung von
Bern :
Christine Eberlein, Tel. 031 372 73 07 (nur am 27.2.) und am 28.2.
01 277 70 08
- Ilisu Webpages
der Erklärung von Bern
- Webpage UBS
- Weitere Infos zu Ilisu und den türkischen
Flüssen
26.02.02: Germany : the parliamentary
majority declares its opposition to dam building on the Danube.
"The Danube will remain a river."
On February 26th the coalition
SPD/Green declared itself in favour of a Danube with no further dams
or canalization, following the expert hearing of February 20th. This
is a clear decision of the parliamentary majority in
favour of the "A" solution for the improvement of the navigability
of the Danube.
This will keep the Danube free-flowing between Straubing and Vilshofen
and respect the priceless floodplains of the area.This decision will
enable the Danube to be developed in an ecological way. The "A"
solution, respecting the river structure, can also be implement veryquickly,
is the cheapest solution, and is the only one to be compatible with
European legislation.
(ERN - From the the Press release of Albert Schmidt, spokesman and
coordinator of the alliance "Bündnis 90/Green party".)
- more Information on
Waterways Projects
- more information on the Danube river
basin
26.02.02:
Die Donau bleibt ein Fluss! Rot-Grüne Koalitionsmehrheit lehnt Stauregulierung
der Donau zwischen Straubing und Vilshofen ab.
Pressemitteilung von Albert Schmidt, MdB (Verkehrspolitischer
Sprecher und politischer Koordinator des AK II der Bundestagsfraktion
BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN).
Berlin, 26.02.2002: Zu den anstehenden Entscheidungen über den Donauausbau
(Staustufen und Kanalisierung oder "sanfter" Ausbau) erklären Rezzo
Schlauch, Fraktionsvorsitzender, und Albert Schmidt, verkehrspolitischer
Sprecher der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen: Die Donau
bleibt ein Fluss ! Heute Vormittag haben sich die Spitzen der Koalitionsfraktionen
von SPD und Bündnis90/DIE GRÜNEN darauf verständigt, im Anschluss
an die Expertenanhörung vom 20. Februar 2002 den Ausbau der Donau
ohne Staustufen und ohne Kanalisierung voranzutreiben.
Dies ist eine klare Entscheidung der Parlamentsmehrheit
für die Verbesserung der Schiffbarkeit der Donau nach Variante A und
für den Erhalt des freifließenden Flusses zwischen Straubing und Vilshofen
mit seinen unschätzbaren Auenlandschaften. Mit dieser Grundsatzentscheidung
steht einem raschen und umweltverträglichen Donauausbau nichts mehr
im Wege. Die Anhörung vom 20. Februar hat klar ergeben: 1) Der "sanfte"
Ausbau mit flussbaulichen Mitteln (Variante A) wird nicht beklagt
und kann somit ohne gerichtliche Verzögerungen am schnellsten realisiert
werden. 2) Er ist mit einem Nutzen-Kosten-Faktor von 8,3 die mit Abstand
wirtschaftlichste Variante und kann über 90% des Verkehrs aufnehmen.
3) Nur die Variante A ist ökologisch vertretbar und mit dem europäischen
Umweltrecht vereinbar, da sie die einmaligen Flusslandschaften (u.a.
FFH-Schutzgebiete) auf Dauer erhält. 4) Die Behauptung der Bayerischen
Staatsregierung, wonach der Bund gegenüber Bayern vertraglich zu einem
Ausbau mit Staustufen verpflichtet sei, wurde eindeutig widerlegt:
Die Vertragslage schreibt das Wie des Ausbaus gerade nicht vor. Wir
erwarten, dass der Bundesverkehrsminister die folgenden Schritte in
Übereinstimmung mit dem politischen Willen der Koalitionsmehrheit
einleitet. Die heutige Übereinkunft ist eine historische Entscheidung
zum Schutz der Donau und für eine Verbesserung der Schiffbarkeit.
Heute ist ein Freudentag für zahllose Menschen, die seit Jahren für
diese Lösung gekämpft haben.
- mehr
Infos zum Ausbau europäischer Flüsse zu Grosswasserstrassen
(english)
- mehr infos zur Donau und ihren Zuflüssen
24.02.02: The
EP Environment Committee approves the am. against the PHN
With 29 votes in favor and 28 against the Environment
Committee has approved today the amendment against the PHN tabled
to the resolution on the sustainable development strategy for the
Barcelona Summit.
Here is the text of the amendment:
6a. Is deeply worried about the precedent set by proposals for the
development of unsustainable water management schemes across Europe,
such as the Spanish National Hydrological Plan (NHP), adopted by the
Spanish Senate on 20 June 2001 and which includes proposals to build
up to 118 new dams and widespread irrigation infrastructure, as they
do not address the issue of sustainable water use through pricing
mechanisms and other water conservation measures and calls on the
European Commission for these reasons not to provide any EU funding
for these transfer water projects.
We have now to expect an EPP campaign either to remove the resolution
on the Barcelona summit from the agenda of the plenary session of
next week or to influence the vote of the liberals (ELDR group), who
was split during the vote on the amendment!
More information on the Spanish National
Hydrological Plan.
22.02.02: New technique compares
pollution at different estuaries
Researchers at Cornell University in the US have developed
the first methodology for directly comparing levels of polluted run-off
from agriculture and industry between estuaries.
Read
full article
Older news
Back to the Homepage
These pages and their content are © Copyright
of European Rivers Network.
For more information, remarks or propositions, send
us a message !.