to
the "2009 news"
31.12.08
: China Slows Water Project
South-to-North Plan Faces 4-Year Delay on Impact Concerns
By SHAI OSTER
Wall Street Journal. DECEMBER 31, 2008
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123064275944842277.html
BEIJING --
China is delaying part of its plan to divert billions of tons
of water to its parched north, amid concerns that the massive
project could cause previously unexpected environmental damage.
The four-year
delay affects the central of three sections of the controversial
"South-to-North" water diversion project. The project
is
designed to move water from China's central and southern regions
up to the arid northern provinces -- in some cases hundreds of
kilometers
away along three man-made channels.
The total
project, at an estimated $62 billion, is expected to cost nearly
three times the Three Gorges Dam, the world's largest dam, and
to take decades to complete. It is expected to require the relocation
of some 300,000 people and, when finished, to carry a volume of
water
along its eastern, central and western routes that's more than
half of California's annual consumption.
The eastern
route, which mostly follows the ancient Grand Canal, is largely
done. The mountainous western route, which is the most
controversial and technically challenging, isn't slated for completion
until 2050. The central section was supposed to start operation
in
2010, but officials now say it will be launched in 2014.
In a written
response to questions from The Wall Street Journal, the South-to-North
Water Diversion Office under the State Council, China's
cabinet, confirmed changes in the plan, but said the new timetable
represents an "adjustment," not a delay. "We have
taken appropriate
measures to mitigate the environmental adverse effects that the
construction projects may make," the office said. The new
measures
include dams that could maintain higher water levels and ways
to cut pollution.
The government
says the South-to-North project is the only way to solve chronic
water shortages. China's water supply relative to its
population is a quarter of the world average ratio, and most of
the water is concentrated in the south. In Beijing, the capital,
located
in the north, the ratio is one-thirtieth the world average. The
north's main river, the Yellow River, has temporarily dried up
in some
places, and underground aquifers are badly depleted. The South-to-North
project, first proposed by Mao Zedong in 1952, was
approved in 2001.
Critics, mostly
scientists and environmentalists, have continued to voice opposition
to the project, fearing it will waste tens of
billions of dollars and damage the environment while offering
only a temporary fix. During 2008, local governments joined in
the criticism.
The central
stretch of the project runs from the Han River, a Yangtze River
tributary in central China's Hubei Province, north to Beijing.
During December, Zou Qingping, the deputy chief of the Hubei Province
bureau of environmental protection, told the local government
that
reducing water in the Han River would worsen pollution, according
to several local media reports. China's state-controlled media
was
allowed to report extensively on the controversy, a marked departure
from the strict controls over coverage of the Three Gorges Dam.
The revised
plans for the central section, approved during December, include
building a dam and diverting water from the Yangtze River into
the Han. But Du Yun, a geologist with the Institute of Geodesy
and Geophysics at the China Academy of Sciences, said that even
those
measures may not be sufficient. His research claims that siphoning
off a third of the water from the Han River's Danjiangkou reservoir,
as
the plan calls for, will raise the risk of floods, increase sediment
and worsen water quality -- hurting navigation and irrigation
for
local residents, and limiting supplies for industrial and municipal
use.
The new plan
doesn't address the more controversial western route, which would
transfer water along canals carved through rock from the
Yangtze headwaters in Tibet to the Yellow River.
-Ellen Zhu
in Shanghai and Gao Sen and Kersten Zhang in Beijing
contributed to this article.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: china@list.internationalrivers.org
23.12.08
: Turkey : Ilisu Dam Project facing severe backlash, NGOs welcome
decision by Germany, Austria and Switzerland to suspend contracts
(NGO Press Release)
Vienna, Berlin,
Berne, Dec. 23, 2008 --- The European Ilisu Campaign welcomed
the historic announcement by the German, Austrian and Swiss Governments
to pull out of the Ilisu Dam project in Turkey after 180 days
and claimed a landmark campaign victory. This unprecedented withdrawal
reflects the serious social, cultural and environmental damage
posed by the proposed dam. It is the first time that an agreed
export credit guarantee has been suspended by any European Government.
However, the European Ilisu Campaign remains concerned that the
final withdrawal can only take place after a 180 day period.
We are
delighted and welcome this necessary and courageous step by the
three governments. We will do everything to ensure that the withdrawal
will be completed after the 180 day period, declared the
members of the European Ilisu Campaign - CounterCurrent
of Germany, ECA-Watch Austria, and the Berne Declaration of Switzerland.
These non-government organisations announced that they will step
up their work in Turkey to have the Ilisu region recognised and
listed as a UNESCO World Cultural and Natural Heritage site.
This decision
of the German, Austrian and Swiss Governments means that the delivery
contracts of the European construction companies Andritz
in Austria, Zueblin AG in Germany, , and Alstom in Switzerland
have been suspended thus stopping themfrom proceeding with
any project deliveries. Furthermore, the European banks - Bank
Austria/UniCredit, DekaBank and Société Générale
cannot disburse the loans they approved. This will leave
the project a shortfall of 500 million Euros which will be very
difficult for Turkey to raise - especially in the wake of the
financial crisis.
With this
important decision officially labelling the Ilisu Dam Project
as deficient, it is much more likely that the Tigris valley at
Ilisu will be saved. The decision will further strengthen the
national campaign inside Turkey which had already been boosted
by the backing of prominent national actors and musicians.
Despite Turkeys
voiced intent to go ahead with the construction under any circumstances,
other potential financiers will be much more careful to get involved
and expose themselves to strong international criticism.
The proposed
Ilisu Dam would displace approximately 65,000 people, destroy
400 km of river ecosystems and threaten numerous species. Approximately
300 important archaeological sites would be submerged in the reservoir
including Hasankeyf, one of the oldest permanently inhabited towns
on the planet.
Contacts:
Heike Drillisch,
CounterCurrent, ++49(0)177 345 26 11
Ulrich Eichelmann, ECA-Watch Austria, ++43 (676) 662 1512
Christine Eberlein, Berne Declaration, ++41 794263056
see
also our RiverNet Ilisu pages
23.12.08
: Ilisu-Projekt vor dem Aus. NGOs begrüßen Entscheidung,
die Lieferverträge zu suspendieren.
(Wien, Berlin,
Bern 23.12.2008) - Hocherfreut reagiert die europäische Ilisu
Kampagne auf die Ankündigung Deutschlands, aus dem Ilisu
Staudammprojekt nach einer Frist von 180 Tagen auszusteigen. Da
die Entscheidung im Konsens gefallen ist, werden auch die Schweizer
und die österreichische Ankündigung in Kürze erwartet.
Dies ist ein einzigartiger Schritt, denn weltweit wurde nie zuvor
eine bereits bewilligte Deckung von Lieferaufträgen ausgesetzt.
Ein wichtiger Etappensieg der Ilisu-Kampagne ist damit erreicht.
Einziger Wermutstropfen, so die Nichtregierungsorganisationen,
ist die erneute 180 Tagesfrist für die Türkei. Erst
danach kann der Ausstieg endgültig vollzogen werden.
"Wir
begrüßen den notwendigen und mutigen Schritt der drei
Staaten. Wir werden alles daran setzen, dass der Ausstieg in einem
halben Jahr endgültig vollzogen wird, so Heike Drillisch,
Koordinatorin der deutschen Ilisu-Kampagne GegenStrömun.
Außerdem kündigen die Organisationen an, die Arbeit
in der Türkei zu verstärken. Das Ziel ist, den Bau des
Staudamms zu verhindern und stattdessen die Region zum UNESCO
Weltkultur- und Weltnaturerbe zu erklären
Die Entscheidung
Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz bedeutet, dass
die Lieferverträge der europäischen Baufirmen - die
Andritz AG, die im Besitz der STRABAG befindliche deutsche Züblin
AG und der Schweizer Generatorenlieferant Alstom suspendiert
werden und diese jetzt keine Lieferungen an das Projekt vornehmen
können. Auch die europäischen Banken - Bank Austria/UniCredit,
DekaBank und Société Générale
können ihre zugesagten Kredite nicht auszahlen. Insgesamt
fehlen der Türkei damit ca. 500 Mio Euro, die angesichts
der Finanzkrise nicht so leicht zu ersetzen sind.
Die Chancen sind damit deutlich gestiegen, dass der Ilisu-Staudamm
trotz gegenteiliger Beteuerungen der Türkei nicht realisiert
wird. Durch den bedeutenden Schritt der Europäer ist das
Projekt offiziell als ungenügend abgestempelt.
Andere Finanziers werden sich vorsehen, in ein solches Projekt
einzusteigen und sich damit internationaler Kritik auszusetzen.
Zudem erhält die Kampagne in der Türkei neuen Auftrieb.
Zuletzt hatten sich zahlreiche prominente Musiker und Schauspieler
der Kampagne in der Türkei angeschlossen.
Durch den
Ilisu-Staudamm würden rund 65.000 Menschen ihre Heimat verlieren,
400 Kilometer Flusslandschaften zerstört und zahlreiche Tier-
und Pflanzenarten gefährdet. Circa 300 wertvolle archäologische
Stätten würden im Stausee versinken, darunter eine der
ältesten Städte der Menschheit, Hasankeyf.
Kontakt: Heike Drillisch, 0177 345 26 11-
GegenStrömung - Ilisu-Kampagne Deutschland
CounterCurrent - Ilisu Campaign Germany
Heike Drillisch
heike.drillisch@gegenstroemung.org, Tel. ++49-(0)177-345 26 11
ECA Watch
Ãsterreich
c/o GLOBAL 2000 Umweltschutzorganisation
Neustiftgasse 36, 1070 Wien
eca-watch-austria@gmx.at
www.eca-watch.at
www.stopilisu.com
weitere
Infos auf unseren RiverNet Seiten zu Ilisu
18.12.08
: China : Yunnan's Xiaowan Hydropower Station started filling
with water
This is the
fourth dam on the Upper Mekong cascade that has been completed,
and as the article states, is the largest dam in the cascade.
We will start to see even greater impacts downstream once Xiaowan
becomes operational.
According
to Sinohydro Corporation, Yunnan Xiaowan Hydropower Station has
already closed the dam gates, and started filling with water.
This
paved the way for power generation one year ahead of schedule.
Xiaowan Hydropower
Station is located in the middle reaches of Lancang River. Its
installed capacity is 4200 MW, which is among the largest
dam of the eight-dam cascade in the middle and lower reaches of
Lancang River. Sinohydro Corporation is responsible for the
construction of diversion tunnel.
The construction
of Xiaowan Hydropower Station started in 20th January 2002, and
the river was dammed in 12th October 2004. Once it formed a
reservoir of 14.9 billion cubic meter, it can effectively regulate
the downstream flow during the flood and dry seasons, and the
Lancang-
Mekong River will become a truly "golden waterway".
Source: Xinhua
Net. 18 December 2008, http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-12/18/content_10525479.htm
via
: IR International Rivers
12.12.08
: China: Conference: Official Cites Hydropower's Messy Splash
(Caijing Magazine)
A
top political adviser says more government oversight is needed
in the wake of a decade of disorderly hydropower development in
China.
By staff reporter
Han Wei, From the Caijing Annual Conference , http://english.caijing.com.cn/2008-12-12/110038125.html
The rapid
development of hydropower in China has been marked by poor planning
and environmental damage that calls for more efficiency in government,
said Shao Bingren, a senior official at the National Committee
of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
Speaking at
the Caijing annual conference in Beijing on December 12, Shao
said a snapshot of China's excessive and disorderly development
of hydropower can be found along the upper Yangtze River, where
the environment has been put at risk.
A study by
a research team under CPPCC, China's top political adviser, has
found more than 3,000 hydropower plants operating or planned along
the Yangtze's upper reaches and its tributaries suffer from weak
management or supervision.
Local governments
in China's river-rich southwest have been accelerating hydropower
plant construction in recent years as part of a major effort to
resolve local power shortages. But many projects have lacked a
scientific approach to planning, Shao said.
According
to the Ministry of Environmental Protection, 26 hydropower plants
were built along the 503-kilometer Tuo River in Sichuan Province
- nearly one every 20 kilometers. And eight hydropower plants
have been built along the 120-kilometer upper Min River, said
Shao.
These dense
concentrations of hydropower plants are destroying local environments.
And some plants were built in earthquake zones, posing huge risks.
Shao said
the development strategy for the hydropower industry in the Yangtze
region is now a decade old. But execution of the strategy has
been irrational.
Now, Shao
said, government administration over the industry should be strengthened
by tightening supervision and providing more guidance.
In addition,
Shao said, governments can use the current economic slowdown as
an opportunity to improve government administration, reform pricing
system and boost social services, which he thinks will help China
emerge successfully from the global financial crisis.
source : Caijing
Magazine, via International Rivers
27.11.08
: ICOLD (Art. Le Monde) : Longtemps bannis, les grands barrages
reviennent en force
Pour ses 80
ans, lundi 24 novembre, la Commission internationale des grands
barrages (CIGB) a fait couler le champagne sous la coupole du
Palais de la découverte, à Paris. Après des
années de purgatoire, cette organisation regroupant tous
les grands noms du secteur a de bonnes raisons de croire à
son retour en grâce.
Les organisations
non gouvernementales (ONG) continuent de dénoncer les dangers
des grands barrages sur l'environnement et l'impact social de
déplacements de populations rarement maîtrisé,
mais leurs arguments portent peu face à ceux mettant en
avant l'urgence face au changement climatique et à la crise
alimentaire. En 2005, la Banque mondiale a donné sa bénédiction
en soutenant la construction de Nam Theun 2 au Laos. "Tous
les feux sont au vert", résume Michel de Vivo, secrétaire
général de la CIGB.
Les chiffres
confirment ce tournant : 1 201 grands barrages - à savoir
des ouvrages de plus de 15 mètres de haut stockant au minimum
3 millions de mètres cubes d'eau - étaient en construction
en 2007 ; 178 avaient été mis en service l'année
précédente. Le mouvement concerne tous les continents,
même s'il est largement tiré par les BRIC (Brésil,
Russie, Inde, Chine).
Pour Pékin,
l'équation est simple. "Le développement des
barrages est une priorité pour réduire notre dépendance
au charbon et assurer notre sécurité alimentaire",
explique Shucheng Wang, président du Comité chinois
des grands barrages. "20 % du plan de relance adopté
pour faire face aux impacts de la crise financière mondiale
seront consacrés à sécuriser nos ressources
en eau au cours des deux prochaines années", précise
M. Wang : soit plus de 100 milliards de dollars qui iront notamment
dans les barrages.
Pour défendre
la place de l'hydroélectricité dans la palette des
solutions alternatives aux énergies fossiles, ses promoteurs
mettent l'accent sur trois avantages : elle fait partie des énergies
renouvelables, elle est peu polluante et son coût est plus
faible. "D'autant plus faible que les barrages sont gigantesques",
selon Michel de Vivo qui met les 3 cents du prix de revient du
kilowattheure produit dans l'hydraulique en face du 0,5 dollar
de l'énergie solaire ou des 10 cents de l'éolien.
Dominique
Nahon, directrice du développement durable d'EDF, se veut
toutefois plus prudente : "Nous devons démontrer qu'en
milieu tropical, le bilan carbone de nos barrages est positif."
Ce qui est loin d'être acquis. Des études ont montré
que les réservoirs de barrage constituent, au moins dans
les premières années de la mise en service, des
sources importantes d'émissions de gaz à effet de
serre en raison des rejets de méthane liés à
la décomposition des végétaux submergés.
Le président de la CGIB, Luis Berga, ne juge pas l'obstacle
insurmontable : "Nous savons ce qu'il faut faire. Il existe
des recommandations reconnues par la communauté internationale.
Et aujourd'hui, aucun grand barrage ne trouve de financement s'il
ne les respecte pas", assure-t-il en plaidant pour que ces
infrastructures soient reconnues comme des investissements prioritaires
dans la stratégie d'adaptation au changement climatique.
POTENTIEL
AFRICAIN
La requête
n'est pas anodine. Si la Chine, assise sur ses centaines de milliards
de dollars de réserves de change, peut se passer des financements
internationaux pour assumer sa politique des grands barrages -
à commencer par celui des Trois-Gorges -, ce n'est pas
le cas de l'Afrique. Or le continent noir demeure un espace largement
inexploité. Son potentiel hydroélectrique représente
13 % du total mondial mais seulement 8 % sont utilisés.
Si trois des plus grands barrages mondiaux y ont été
construits, ils sont réservés à l'irrigation.
70 % de la population est privée d'accès à
l'énergie courante.
Lundi, à
Paris, l'Union africaine, la CGIB et d'autres partenaires du monde
de l'énergie ont signé une "déclaration
mondiale en faveur des barrages et de l'hydroélectricité
pour le développement durable de l'Afrique". Derrière
cette annonce pompeuse, les intentions sont claires : les grands
barrages doivent redevenir un instrument du développement
de ces pays.
"La saison
sèche dure huit mois par an. Sans retenue d'eau pour développer
l'irrigation qui, aujourd'hui, ne concerne que 7 % des terres
arables, nous ne pourrons améliorer notre productivité.
Et nous avons besoin d'électricité pour la conservation
des récoltes", plaide le ministre de l'agriculture
du Burkina Faso, Abdoulaye Combary. Son pays va lancer les travaux
du quatrième grand barrage du pays à Samendeni,
sur le fleuve Mouhoun. La Banque mondiale, la Banque africaine
de développement et des pays arabes apportent l'essentiel
des 180 millions de dollars que coûtera le projet. Le site
avait été identifié en 1976, après
la grande sécheresse au Sahel.
Laurence Caramel,
Le Monde
Article paru dans l'édition du 27.11.08.
26.11.08
: Australia / Traveston Dam project : Aussie Activists Celebrate
Dam Suspension (by IR)
Communities
in the Mary Valley in Queensland, Australia, are celebrating the
announcement by state Premier, Anna Bligh, that construction on
a bitterly opposed dam would be delayed by up to four years. The
Traveston Crossing Dam would displace hundreds of families, flood
thousands of acres of rich farmland, and endanger iconic species
including the Queensland lungfish and the endangered Mary River
turtle and cod.
Proponents
claim the dam is needed to increase water storage because of the
worsening droughts caused by global warming. Opponents point to
studies showing numerous cheaper alternatives for saving and storing
water, and the high evaporation and greenhouse gas emissions from
the big, shallow reservoir.
An email to
supporters from the Save the Mary River campaign group says:
November 25th,
2008, is a day that will always be remembered in the Mary Valley
as the first serious cracks started to show in the state government's
push to build Traveston Dam. Anna Bligh's shock announcement that
the plan would be shelved for a number of years because of environmental
& economic concerns was met with jubilance as hard working
campaigners flocked to the banks of the Mary River to celebrate.
Whilst enjoying
this major victory, campaigners were very clear that they know
the fight's not over yet. They vowed to increase the pressure
on the state & federal government's until this dam proposal
is dead & buried forever!
Within hours
of the announcement, the riverbanks at Traveston Crossing were
filled with people and media... Check out the new album on www.stoppress.com.au
called 'Backdown or Backoff?' and share the joy of the Save the
Mary campaign!
I visited
the beautiful Mary valley in September 2007 together with Roberto
Epple of European Rivers Network. I was amazed at the strength
of opposition to the dam, which from the bumper sticks and signs
along the roadsides appeared to be almost unanimous in local communities.
I was also astonished at the callous and autocratic attitude of
the state government which seemed determined to trample on the
rights of local people. And deeply impressed at the determination,
energy, creativity - and bloody good humor - of the local activists.
Congratulations
to Glenda, Steve, Kevin, Arkin and all the rest of the Mary lovers.
As the campaign slogan says, "In Cod We Trust!"
The Mary River
announcement comes on a good Thanksgiving week for river lovers
with the annoucement of a funding setback for the misleadingly
cheerfully named Xalala Dam in Guatemala, and a legal roadblock
for the Jirau Dam on the Maderia River in Brazil.
source : International
Rivers www.internationalrivers.org
for more information
: http://www.stoppress.com.au/
and /or http://www.savethemaryriver.com/
14.10.08
: China plans string of dams in Tibet (750 dams
across Tibet )
Hydropower
seen as way to boost local economy
Environment groups fear wider impact downstream
China is planning
to build a string of new dams in southern Tibet to boost its
electricity supply, the region's chief of water resources told
the Guardian.
Hundreds of
millions of people across Asia depend on rivers that originate
in
Tibet, and previous hydroelectric proposals have proved controversial
because
of their impact on the environment, local people and communities
downstream.
But officials
in Lhasa argue the dams are the least damaging way of providing
power and raising living standards in the region. "Tibet
is rich in water
resources and has good potential for setting up more hydropower
stations and
dams," said Baima Wangdui, director of the region's water
resources department.
"With the economic development of Tibet we need more resources.
We will take
great care in protecting Tibet's natural life and consider the
[impact] on
society."
They add that
hydropower is cleaner and more efficient than coal, oil, gas or
nuclear power stations to generate electricity. A 2003 study by
the ministry of
water suggested it could generate 1,800bn kilowatt hours a year
in Tibet.
The director
said he did not know exactly how many dams would be built in the
next decade because there was no detailed planning as yet. But
he added that
experts were considering sites.
"We haven't
got any hydropower stations set up along big rivers like the
Brahmaputra, but in the future we will consider setting them up
on these
sites," he said. "The upper reaches of the rivers it
is forbidden to develop;
the middle reaches [in places like Lhasa and Xigatze] are more
populated and
can have limited development under certain conditions and can
keep the balance
with environmental protection; the lower reaches of those rivers
in the deep
valleys and some remote areas are the main part we are developing."
Zhuang Hongxiang,
an official at Tibet's environment bureau, added: "We are
trying to solve the electricity shortage and do the least damage
to our
environment." She argued that environmental impact assessments
at the planning
stage and careful supervision would ensure that the projects did
not cause
damage, particularly given that exploitation of Tibet's rich water
resources
was low to date.
But Tashi
Tsering, a researcher on Tibetan water resources at the University
of
British Columbia, warned that assessments did not recognise the
full impact of
damming. While they consider local biodiversity, they frequently
failed to
consider water quality and roles played by free-flowing rivers
such as nutrient
recycling.
"The
rivers and mountains where these dams will be built and new reservoirs
will inundate are often considered sacred.
"Resettlement
and compensation cannot solve the issue," added Tsering,
at the
Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability. He said
the government
shelved a hydropower project at a sacred lake in east Tibet two
years ago after
opposition. "It's not that the Chinese government's policies
are immovable, but
it requires strategic planning and campaigning from local people,
journalists
and environmental groups," he said.
Aviva Imhof,
campaign director at the International Rivers Federation, said:
"The headwaters of most of the major rivers of Asia are in
Tibet, so damming
them could have implications downstream."
Tania Branigan
in Lhasa
The Guardian, Tuesday October 14 2008.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/14/china-tibet
____________________________________
China plans
dams across Tibet
China is set to build more than 750 hydroelectric power stations
across Tibet
to boost the region's electricity supply.
China is determined
to dam Tibet's rivers and lakes despite concerns about the
local environment and about the effect the projects will have
on neighbouring
countries.
Among others,
Tibet is the source of the Yangtze, the Indus and the Brahmaputra
rivers. Almost half the world's population live in the irrigation
basins of
rivers that originate in Tibet.
In the last
eight years, the Chinese government has invested 2.9 billion RMB
(£244 million) in building hydroelectric power stations
and it now wants to
step up the pace of construction.
In the past,
Tibetans have opposed many of the projects. In particular, the
project to dam the holy Yamdrok Yumtso, or Scorpion Lake, which
lies at 14,500
ft above sea level and is thought to contain the spirit of Tibet.
More than
1,500 members of the People's Liberation Army now guard the lake,
and
no civilians are allowed near.
Chinese officials
maintain, however, that the hydropower projects are the least
environmentally-damaging way of electrifying the region and raising
living
standards. Wang Qinghua, the head of the regional power board,
said over 1.9
million Tibetan residents, or 69 per cent of the population, now
have access to
electricity, a 400 per cent increase from the figure three decades
ago.
The Longtan
hydropower station in Nanning will come on line before the end
of
the year, according to Dai Bo, the general manager. Only the Three
Gorges Dam
and the unbuilt Xiluodu Dam project are bigger in size than the
4,900 megawatt
Tibetan dam.
Longtan will
cost around Pounds2.5 billion and is a key project for China's
western provinces, boasting the highest concrete dam in the world
and the
largest underground industrial complex.
More than
80,000 Tibetans were relocated so that it could be built on the
upper
reaches of the Hongshui river.
Two other
major power stations have come online in the last year. The latest
was a 40,000 kilowatt power station which started up at Gongbo'gyamda
County in
east Tibet two weeks ago.
Wang Lidong,
director of the station's construction, said it had cost 60
million and would ease power shortages in the area.
By Malcolm
Moore in Shanghai
The Telegraph (UK). 14 Oct 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/tibet/3193790/China-plans-dams-across-Tibet.html
via International
Rivers
08.10.08.
Germany, Austria and Switzerland have started the official process
of withdrawing financial support for the Ilisu project in Turkey.
According
to the German Under-Secretary of State, Erich Stather, from the
German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development,
the three countries initiated exit proceedings yesterday by sending
an Environmental Failure notice to the Turkish government. From
now on, Turkey has 60 days left to fulfil the conditions attached
to the Ilisu Project. Non-governmental organisations consider
it unlikely that Turkey will fulfil these conditions, that they
have been putting off for two years, in just two months.
"The pullout could be completed by Saint Nicolas Day on the
6th December. Such a diplomatic step has not been taken ever before
in the history of the European export economy", said Ulrich
Eichelmann from ECA Watch Austria. Heike Drillisch from the German
Ilisu Campaign CounterCurrent comments: "We welcome this
long overdue decision from the three European governments. It
is a great success for the Ilisu Dam Campaign. We will be watching
very carefully to make sure that there are no underhand compromises
made with Turkey at the last minute."
The start of the pullout process became necessary as independent
experts reported time and time again that Turkey was not meeting
its obligations and was ignoring international standards. In March
2007, the three countries had signed a contract with Turkey covering
export credit guarantees to insure work on the Ilisu Dam project
by "their" construction companies (Andritz AG, Zueblin
AG, Alstom). Thereupon, Bank Austria, now UniCredit, the German
Deka Bank and the French Société Générale
agreed to provide loans of at least 450 million euros. This amount
may not be available for the project anymore as, without governmental
support, the banks are likely to also back out of the project.
Contracts with the construction companies will then also be in
doubt.
"The Europeans' likely pullout is good news for the inhabitants
of Hasankeyf and a motivation for us to step up our opposition
to the project in Turkey itself. We have been given a real chance
to save our home with its nature and cultural heritage that is
thousands of years old," commented the Mayor of Hasankeyf,
Abdulyahap Kusen.
Worldwide opposition to the project has made "Ilisu"
into one of the most controversial reservoir dam projects. A delegation
from Hasankeyf including Mayor Kusen, the Turkish nature conservation
organisation Doga Dernegi, and representatives of the German and
Austrian Ilisu Campaign are currently in Berlin to campaign for
the final pullout from the project.
Further Information:
Ulrich Eichelmann, ECA Watch Österreich, ulrich.eichelmann@eca-watch.at,
+43-(0)676 662 1512
Heike Drillisch, Gegenströmung - Ilisu-Kampagne Deutschland,
heike.drillisch@weed-online.org, +49-(0)177 - 345 26 11
Christine Eberlein, Erklärung von Bern, ceberlein@evb.ch,
+41-(0)794 263 056
see
also ERNs Webpage
25.09.2008
: Bulgaria Government Revives Hydroelectric Projects on Danube
River
Bulgaria's government decided Thursday that the Minister of Energy
and Economy Petar Dimitrov was going coordinate and govern the
re-launching of two joint hydroelectric projects with Romania
on the Danube River - "Nikopol-Turnu Magurele" and "Silistra-Calarasi".
Dimitrov is going to chair the interdepartmental working group,
which must examine, analyze and confirm the technical, economic,
and environmental feasibility of the two projects, and to consider
the opportunities for finding private partners to realize them.
The
"Nikopol-Turnu Magurele" project envisages the construction
of a dam on the Danube close to the Bulgarian town of Nikopol,
and the Romanian town of Turnu Magurele, and about 7 km northwest
of the town of Belene, where Bulgaria's second nuclear power plant
will be constructed.
The
project will aim to improve the navigation of the river, and to
take advantage of its hydroelectric potential not unlike the Iron
Gates Dam between Serbia and Romania.
The
dam will be wide about 16 meters, which would allow the construction
of a highway, and a railroad connecting the Bulgarian and the
Romanian banks of the Danube.
After
the completion of this project both Bulgaria and Romania are expected
to have new electricity production capacities of 440 MW each,
which will produce about 2200 GW/h of electricity per year.
The
"Silistra-Calarasi" project will be similar, only of
smaller scale. It will include the construction of a dam close
to the Bulgarian city of Silistra, and a water-powered complex
with the capacity of 265 MW, and production of 1642 GW/h of electricity
per year.
The
construction of "Nikopol-Turnu Magurele" complex was
planned in the 1960s, and was formally started in 1977.
However,
the positive effects of its completion were disputed by a report
of the Ministry of Environment in 1999, which stated that dam
would cause the river level to rise by 7 meters, and to flood
three-quarters of the town of Nikopol, and 500 000 decares of
agricultural land.
source
: http://www.bgbusiness.com/news.php?news_id=19129
older
News